Protected by Copyscape DMCA Takedown Notice Violation Search

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Reflecting On Thabiso Mchunu's Shocking (?) Domination of Eddie Chambers, Matters of Heavyweight Size Disparities and Wladimir Klitschko's Career As A "Super" Heavyweight

Mchunu VS Chambers:

In a huge breakout performance this month, Thabiso "The Rock" Mchunu had a close couple rounds that I gave to Chambers to start the fight, but on my card he took all eight following rounds in a very impressive clinic. Class was in session. What was the lesson? It was about making a counter-puncher take the lead, following aimlessly without a target. Eddie Chambers has made a career developing a style to use hand speed and counter-punching against significantly bigger and slower men and last night he was completely, almost ironically, jinxed by a short, stubby southpaw, built like a refrigerator, who gave away no speed disadvantage to speak of, and made him take the lead for the majority of the night, giving him no significant countering opportunities. Mchunu was extremely impressive in an enormous step up in his level of opposition.

Chambers was absolutely baffled by this stylistic challenge and no longer had a speed and maneuverability advantage to apply his style-a style, to say again, which he developed over an entire career, and one which was useless against this smaller man. He could not take the lead. He was frustrated nearly every minute of every round. Mchunu's punches, every one that seemed to land anywhere- gloves, body, head, elbows, seemed to make loud, belting noises. This guy is powerful, quick, smart; he could be the next man to earn a major world title at cruiserweight. Time will tell if Chambers would do much better with a rangier, orthodox cruiserweight (Lebedev comes to mind), or if he simply shouldn't have moved down from heavyweight to begin with, like fans aplenty have assumed he should for years. Or even, sad to say, if he's not close to the end of his career, rather than entering a second phase.

I won't rush to assumptions. It's just one fight, one night. Mchunu could turn out a special fighter at this weight. He's merely 25 now and I hear he's getting many deserved offers on the back of this performance. Chambers could still turn out a championship caliber there, at cruiserweight, as well. We simply do not know. Styles make fights, attributes make fights, and I feel both the supposed size "advantage" Chambers had worked against him as much as the style that was executed to perfection by The Rock.

Aside from the fact that I'm assuming styles played a large part in this outcome, Mchunu really had the performance of the night for me on his NBC Sports card, because only Wladimir Klitschko has dominated Chambers in any way. His other losses (against two championship names in Adamek and Povetkin) were far cries from being dominated. That brings me to a thought on reigning heavyweight champion and former Chambers conqueror Wladimir Klitschko.

Wladimir's thankless job as a big champion:

The thought Chambers VS Mchunu set me to, albeit not for faithfully direct comparison, is that of the all-shapes-and-sizes challenge of the heavyweight division fighters. This challenge can't be found to such extreme physical differences between opponents at any other weight classes. It is also the challenge that many can't understand to be a challenge at all, for a large heavyweight. Wladimir's often not getting credit so much as grumbles and groans for out-finessing smaller opponents (as opposed to blame for not having the unrealistic ability to put them all to sleep in the first round by overpowering them with size, when his "advantage" is large) is something I find funny. Having to fight men of all shapes, sizes, attributes and styles is something that a long-reigning heavyweight champion must usually do with far greater physical extremes than a champion from any other weight class. In doing so, the larger size is not always, and I repeat, not always advantage only, when discussing the larger heavyweights. The assumption that it's simply easier and only easier, without question, across the board, the more height, reach and weight (good weight) you have over your opponent, is a faulty assumption. Because they can pose their own challenges. It's also this faulty assumption I find more often than not when boxing fans discuss his matches, as many of the best contenders have been significantly smaller than Wladimir.

I've heard some people say that it's only a matter of size that makes many of Wlad's fights uncompetitive. Because he is a naturally very large heavyweight. I think about this in seeing a man he dominated and obliterated in Chambers just having been attacked with a similar back-foot, small man game plan which Wladimir has dominated multiple times, including with Chambers, and Chambers couldn't come close to cracking the riddle. Because it takes something in the skill department that many refuse to recognize, in order to not be outmaneuvered and out-hustled by smaller men with presumably more speed of hand and foot and higher capacity for output, as well as flat out having less of a target to offer and an unusual ability to cause the opponent to over-extend and unbalance themselves trying to meet that smaller target.

Smaller men have options to do many things to offset disparities in overall size, the strategies available when the skill level is there. Skills are the issue, not the size alone. Part of boxing success is learning what parts of your game to emphasize, according to your measurements, and that of your opponent. Presumably, in strategy to offset a significantly larger man's strength and range, the option tends to exist in an offensive sense, with the ability to put pressure on a significantly bigger man by using more energy than he's likely to be able to keep up with via punch volume and/or in a defensive sense, exerting more energy in movement than he can in chasing you down, as well as exercising what is normally a higher degree of coordination, with such required mobility. You can reach the targets faster on the inside, where longer arms are a liability or force them to chase you from the outside and give up their height by coming to you in any number of overaggressive mistaken movements that chasing can and usually does lead to.

There's a reason why the heavyweight division is unlimited in weight. Because size is, at this upper level, this maximum level, a self-limiting matter which does not need further regulation by way of more weight classes. It's never proven to, and likely never will, especially after the fully fledged inception of the cruiserweight division in the nineteen-eighties, or at least after its subsequent increase in weight limit. You trade one advantage for another, the larger you are, in the fight game, in its King Division. It's the skill that makes the difference, and the know-how for which skills to use when the man opposing you is drastically changing sizes from fight to fight. Klitschko's skill and know-how (as well as the late Emanuel Steward's know-how)  is what has allowed him not to, at any time in the past nine years' streak without defeat, have a night with an Eddie Chambers type- the type that, in a way, Chambers just had with Mchunu. A night where a smaller man using a size disparity to his advantage completely unhinges your game.

For years, we've seen men try to use their smaller stature to advantage with Wladimir, to aid bait-and-counter plans, tucker him out, run him around the ring, or bore their way inside where the lanky Klitschko hates it, or, as I said earlier, to outmaneuver and out-hustle. What's happened in these instances is Wlad has used his incredibly focused skill to defeat them, while tying them in knots on the inside, picking them apart with his jab and long straight rights on the outside, often ripping them up with short left hooks when they can no longer do anything but stand at mid-range, busted up, frustrated, lost and immobile. For years, Wlad has been making these guys look like an assortment of sitting ducks or running fraidy cats by the time of the knockout blow or final bell's ring. The idea that he's only had advantage from being a large heavyweight (one that was known to have stamina issues, mind you, once upon a time), and advantage only, despite watching him skillfully and repeatedly nullify the standard most effective attempts from the top contenders and titlists to offset size disadvantage from men who've made whole heavyweight careers of this brand of offsetting (Haye, Chagaev, Chambers, Byrd, etc) is as wrongheaded as it is strange. You must recognize the result as part of a broad range of challenges, not pushover by way of size disparity.

There are reasons why Nikolay Valuev is not the division's king for the second longest reign with a major title in the division's history and Wladimir is. There are reasons why Eddie Chambers dazzled in possibly his most impressive performance against a Wladimir-sized, undefeated heavyweight in Alexander Dimitrenko, then followed that with a lopsided loss to Klitschko himself. There's a reason why Ray Austin got a draw with Sultan Ibragimov and both Ibragimov and Austin were dominated by Klitschko afterward. There's a reason why there are dozens of Klitschko-sized and bigger names fighting since Klitschko's debut to not come near his performance record in that time. Skill. Not size. Because size is self-limiting and part of a give and take when it comes to advantages in the heavyweight division.

Why didn't Jameel McCline, Michael Grant, Audley Harrison, Francesco Pianeta, Mariusz Wach, Tony Thompson, Alexander Ustinov, Ray Austin, Lance Whitaker, Henry Akinwande, Derrick Jefferson, Tye Fields, Timo Hoffman, Nicolai Firtha, Jorge Luis Gonzalez, Paea Wolfgramm, Julius Long or any of these other dozens of Klitschko-sized men, having wildly varying degrees of success, perform with similar results against top shelf smaller contenders or otherwise? Not only did Wlad even beat several of those men, and several men to beat several of those men, but his record against the better smaller men is quite a bit above theirs. Skill. It takes skills of all kinds to dominate all sizes. And whether anyone's ready to admit it or not, Wlad's skill has been impressive and praiseworthy in the matches with his smallest opponents, just as much as those of his large stature. He's usually beaten them in ways no one else his size or any size has. 

In closing, hearty congratulations to Mchunu, an exciting new face to the cruiserweight division and boxing television, hopefully, a long tip of the hat to our long-reigning heavyweight champion in Klitschko The Younger and all the larger heavies that have a similar appreciation issue with fans, and a "let's wait and see, chin up" to new cruiserweight and former heavyweight contender Eddie Chambers, coming off a surprisingly (?) difficult night. Most everyone has a horrible day at the office, eventually. I'm just glad mine haven't been televised. 


Work that bag,
Basement Gym Boxing 


Thanks for stopping by our place. Here are some other pages you might enjoy:

Bulgarian Jab Artist Kubrat Pulev Takes Ugly Win Over Tony Thompson, Earns Challenge For Heavyweight Title  

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Caleb Truax Proved He's Serious On Friday Night Fights VS Don George With A Crushing Kayo Win

On the bright side of things for Mr. Truax, he came through perfectly when given the opportunity on a fairly-sized stage, live at the Convention Center, in Minneapolis, Minnesota on ESPN's Friday Night Fights. I was impressed by his performance. A good word to sum it up would be "mature". It was the job of a savvy pro in there. He was better than George at everything I could see last week, June 21, 2013. George was flat-footed and dull, while Truax was bouncing around, using angles, rolling with and slipping punches, countering, leading, aggressive when he needed to be, restrained when it was called for, never risking burning himself out, but still scoring steadily with both hands to the head and body, and even able to get in and out of clinches seemingly at will.

There was talk about George perhaps taking off too much weight. I wouldn't be surprised if he did, as he seemed to lack a next gear that he desperately needed. Truax out-boxed George, but he also outfought him. George, a typical "tough guy", relying on a good chin, a good punch and willpower, was being controlled the majority of the fight, all leading up to a devastating stoppage while being dissected on the ropes, finally clocked on the ear by a big right in the sixth of ten. Truax personified patient aggression all night and showed that he was a super middleweight name to be taken seriously. Not long ago he was being treated as a gimme for a faded Jermain Taylor, a confidence builder with a nice record, until Truax reminded Taylor he was serious. Very serious, though ultimately losing.

On the dark side of things for Mr. Truax is that there are people at about the next three levels of boxing in his division that are serious too. Very serious. An elite among elite champions, Andre Ward, sits at the top-THE champion of the division. He's putting on instant classic clinics on class men. At the next tier sits Mikkel Kessler and Carl Froch, putting on instant classic wars your average fighter would have neither the talent nor the toughness to withstand. Even yet another tier stands proud and strong after that with Robert Stieglitz, Sakio Bika, Arthur Abraham, Marco Antonio Periban and more. And they're all in line ahead of tough fellows like Don George. Now, Caleb Truex looked a class above George on the night and he really earned some distinction, on the bright side, but the cloud surrounded by that silver lining is he's only earned the right to try and surpass a handful of hard, hard men that don't want to share the little spotlight they have in a division full of genuine star fighters fighting over most of the spotlight already. Regardless, congratulations to Mr. Truax on an excellent performance over a good opponent on a good TV date. He earned some applause. He may not be able to earn a major title with all the talent ahead, but that man is serious. Don't doubt it.


Work that bag,
Basement Gym Boxing 

Friday, June 21, 2013

Spotlight on a robbery: Lance Whitaker VS Andrey Fedosov

Recently, I had the chance to catch up on a past fight of interest. Last week, I watched NBC Sports' live presentation with hot, American prospect Bryant "By-By" Jennings taking on cool but rugged prospect from Russia, Andrey Fedosov.  Two good, young heavyweights, duking it out on a good card that I didn't have to pay extra to watch. Good stuff. After a couple close rounds, Bryant laid down the very long arm of the law (big reach on Bryant) with his right uppercut/left hook combination and did enough damage to Fedosov's eye to cause a surprise stoppage by retirement in the corner. A good performance for Mr. Jennings, yet again. But I read many boxing forums and have been seeing a gross underrating of a tough, inside-fighting puncher in Mr. Fedosov, whose career as a prospect really cooled off after a "loss" to an aged Lance Whitaker. Now, no disrespect to Mr. Whitaker, but when people see that a prospect drops one to an older Whitaker, one whose career had really been on the decline, people tend to dismiss the fighter on the losing end with good reason, if they've not seen the action involved.

I've been reading about how Fedosov wasn't much because, hey, he lost to an old Lance Whitaker! I've read that Jennings did not have an impressive showing, considering that his opponent had this "hiccup" in his career. Did Fedosov lose by the famed "one punch can change everything" method? No, it was by decision! Fedosov is just not that good, I read. Well, ladies and gentlemen, Fedosov may not be a "world beater". That's fine to say that. I don't think so either. But I found a nice, perfectly clear copy of this Whitaker match, which I hadn't seen before. And I watched it thoroughly, much to my chagrin. I watched it with baffled disgust, round after round, as I tried to reconcile what I was seeing, the reality of it, with the scorecards I'd read on Boxrec.com. What a nightmare for Mr. Fedosov. What an abuse of honest, hardworking fighters, what actually happened that night, on June 12, almost three years exactly before clashing with Jennings, 2010, in Hollywood, California.

I've seen a lot of robberies in boxing - decades' worth, in fact. This fight ended in one of the worst I've ever seen. I've always been hesitant to call a fight a robbery. I don't call close fights robberies. A lot of fans make that mistake. This, however, was an unmistakable robbery to any person who understands the action they're watching. I had this fight scored 11 rounds to 1 for Andrey Fedosov. Let me repeat that. I scored ELEVEN of TWELVE rounds for Andrey Fedosov. Furthermore, the one round I scored for Whitaker, that was a close round. And though it doesn't say so, currently, on Boxrec, Fedosov scored a knockdown in the fifth round, via big left hook.

So, the first five rounds included a knockdown and were all very, very clear for Fedosov. By the first round you could give Whitaker, the sixth, which I gave him, there's already the equivalent of a half-a-fight lead in scoring for Fedosov. I don't think the crowd is always right, but I will say that the crowd began to audibly shout "Bull-shit! Bull-shit! Bull-shit!" after the cards were read. Make no mistake. This fight was not competitive. The commentators seem to think "pushing out a jab" with consistency when it's not hitting anything but air or gloves is ample reason to call it competitive, but I have eyes. So, I will not. Whitaker lightly pushed his glove out to touch Fedosov's gloves (or just air in front of Fedosov) all through the fight, and seemed to actually get credit for throwing a punch and scoring with it when he did so. Many of these weren't even thrown punches, let alone landed ones. Lightly pushing out your glove is not punching. Touching a glove that way is certainly not a scoring blow either. Any judge who was even slightly competent would see that. This was an insane decision. If this had been two big names, with two big fan bases, you could see a riot from these cards at the billed "Pandemonium at the Palladium".

I'm sick to my stomach after watching this match. Fedosov's career was derailed by this, a brazen robbery. There was no way this was a Whitaker victory. There was no way this was a draw. There is no card of any quality whatsoever that can come up with anything other than a wide Fedosov victory. Yet, Judges Marty Denkin and Raul Caiz Junior somehow came up with a win for Whitaker. Judge Tom Taylor seemingly didn't elect to drink from the same trough leading up to the match, bless him, with his 115-112 card for Fedosov. Not by any stretch should it have been close. This was an easy fight to score, ladies and gentlemen. I haven't seen every Andrey Fedosov fight. I don't know what his record should be. But I do know he didn't lose to Lance Whitaker.

If you get a chance to watch this match and you think I'm exaggerating, please watch that fight. It's out there to find, if you're interested. Fedosov dominated Whitaker and Jennings just beat a very solid man in the tough Russian. Credit to Fedosov for his poise against the giant Whitaker and continuing his career without letting it dishearten him into retirement that he was blatantly cheated and credit to Bryant Jennings for getting the 'W' this last weekend. Jennings is a genuinely class professional and I would love to see Fedosov in there on American television once more against someone like Vyacheslav Glazkov. NBC Sports, please have these men back on the air. Or ESPN, Friday Night Fights, Magomed Abdusalamov and Andrey Fedosov, a killer clash for the fans is there for the taking.


Work that bag,
Basement Gym Boxing



Thanks for stopping by our place. Here are some other pages you might enjoy:

Bulgarian Jab Artist Kubrat Pulev Takes Ugly Win Over Tony Thompson, Earns Challenge For Heavyweight Title 

Dereck Chisora VS Edmund Gerber: Quick Stoppage, Good Performance 

Strange Boxing Quotes: Max Kellerman Almost Becomes Larry Merchant